Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Green v. Nunez

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 2007No. CA 06-1072Published

1ConcurrenceWendell L. Griffen, Judge

We love to overlook the boundaries which we do not wish to pass.

—• Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)

I write separately to address the argument that appellants had standing to intervene in the probate proceeding for administration of the decedent’s estate. Our probate code limits the class of “interested persons” to heirs, devisees, spouses, creditors, and others who have a property right, interest in, or claim against the estate being administered. Ark. Code Ann. § 28-l-102(a)(ll) (Repl. 2004). No legislation to expand or otherwise amend the definitions in § 28-1-102 has been enacted since 1949. We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of Hull v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Helena Regional Medical Center v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Benson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API