Jackson v. Jackson
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Advisoiyv Master Church, who filed the following opinion: “In this case it appears that petitioner1 and defendant were married in 1890; that three children were born of the marriage —Robert, twenty-nine; Alexander, twenty-six; Gladys, twenty-three. During the course of their married life Mrs. Jackson left her husband’s home seven times.
Read the full summary
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Advisoiyv Master Church, who filed the following opinion: “In this case it appears that petitioner1 and defendant were married in 1890; that three children were born of the marriage —Robert, twenty-nine; Alexander, twenty-six; Gladys, twenty-three. During the course of their married life Mrs. Jackson left her husband’s home seven times. She seems to have had no desire to live with her husband as a. wife and gave no reason for leaving except that she preferred to be independent. She refused to stay at home despite the entreaties of…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The decree appealed from will "be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Church.
*218For affirmance — Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenci-iard, Minturn, Black, ILírrenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk — 9. For reversal — Swayze, Parker, Bergen — 3.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Sabia v. SabiaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Antonucci v. AntonucciNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973