Legal Opinion

Casey & Swasey v. Chaytor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1893No. 428Published

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

Conclusions of Fact. — Casey & Swasey, appellants, owned a judgment against J. J. Yost. Execution was issued by virtue thereof, placed in the hands of B. F. Hargett, who levied same On property owned by and in the possession of D. O. Chaytor. An indemnity bond was executed by Casey & Swasey, with A. B. Smith and E. E. Chase as sureties, in favor of said B. F. Hargett, sheriff. The prop erty was sold by virtue of said levy, and D. O. Chaytor became the purchaser for the sum of $930, and the property was turned over to him. Chaytor then brought suit for the conversion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schoolher, Bernstein & Co. v. HutchinsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. E. J. Hart & Co. v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API