Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Piet

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 Mary Piet Black appeals from the portion of the December 12, 2006, Order denying her exceptions to the orphans’ court’s conclusions of law and findings of fact. Co-executors Ann L. Ball and Edward J. Piet cross-appeal from that portion of the Order denying their exceptions to the court’s conclusions and findings.

¶2 On May 13, 1978, Edward A. Piet and Amelia J. Piet (decedent), husband *888and wife, executed reciprocal wills. The wills provided that upon the death of the first spouse, the entirety of the deceased spouse’s estate would pass to the surviving spouse in fee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jane v. VickSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. In Re BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Ruston's Executors v. RustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  4. Ruston v. RustonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1796
  5. In Re Estate of MeyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grimm, R. v. Grimm, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Covalesky v. Covalesky, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API