Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ayo
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
The above consolidated cases were brought by the RTC against former officers and directors of banks who carried Director & Officer Liability Policies (“D & 0”) with Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland (“F & D”). In both eases, the district judges found that no genuine issue of material fact existed, and granted summary judgment in favor of F & D on the grounds that the insureds failed to comply with the notice requirements of the F & D policy. The relevant portions of the policies for each case are identical. The issues of law presented for appeal are also…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Gus S. Mijalis, and Gus S. MijalisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Jensen v. SnellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Livingston Par. Sch. Bd. v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Auster Oil & Gas, Inc. v. StreamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Prodigy Communications Corp. v. Agricultural Excess & Surplus Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Joyce Gorman v. City of OpelousasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Anderson v. IchinoseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- First American Title Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.