Legal Opinion

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ayo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1994No. 93-03730PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

The above consolidated cases were brought by the RTC against former officers and directors of banks who carried Director & Officer Liability Policies (“D & 0”) with Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland (“F & D”). In both eases, the district judges found that no genuine issue of material fact existed, and granted summary judgment in favor of F & D on the grounds that the insureds failed to comply with the notice requirements of the F & D policy. The relevant portions of the policies for each case are identical. The issues of law presented for appeal are also…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Gus S. Mijalis, and Gus S. MijalisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Jensen v. SnellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Livingston Par. Sch. Bd. v. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  5. Auster Oil & Gas, Inc. v. StreamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Prodigy Communications Corp. v. Agricultural Excess & Surplus Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Joyce Gorman v. City of OpelousasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  3. Anderson v. IchinoseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. First American Title Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API