Legal Opinion

Danville Light, Power & Traction Co. v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 30, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Boyle Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Quin —

Affirming.

Appellee sustained serious and permanent injuries during the installation of some heavy machinery at appellant’s plant. A part of said machinery, to-wit: the fly wheel, was in two parts, each weighing 8,500 pounds. The lower section had been installed and while endeavoring to p-lace the upper part, the men operating the winch or windlass permitted the rope to become “balled up” at one end, causing the drum to pull out, striking appellee, and inflicting the injuries complained of.

This is the second appeal of the case. The facts are given more in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Danville Light, Power & Traction Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fullenwider v. BrawnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. J. N. Youngblood Truck Lines v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  3. Hansen v. Standard Oil Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Ware v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Cohen v. Eastern Kentucky Home Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API