Legal Opinion

Stankiewicz v. Heights Construction & Supply Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1928No. Appeal 276PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This appeal is concerned with the construction to be given the clause of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Sec. 427 of Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642, 665), which provides that on taking an appeal from the Workmen’s Compensation Board, “The party taking the appeal shall, at the time of taking the appeal, serve upon the adverse party a ■written notice thereof, setting forth the date of the. appeal and the court in which the same is filed,” and the effect of a failure strictly co comply with its provisions.

The appeal in this case was filed in the court of common pleas on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuel City Mfg. Co. v. Waynesburg Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Bordentown Banking Co. v. ResteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  3. Nice's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  4. Speer v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brumbaugh v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Currie v. Gaugh, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1936
  3. Ellenberger v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1932
  4. Giordonne v. Alaimo Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1929
  5. Koch v. Boalsburg Water Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API