Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Educational Credit Management Corp. v. Jesperson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2009No. 07-3888Published

1ConcurrenceSmith, Circuit Judge

I concur in the court’s judgment that, applying de novo review, Jesperson is ineligible for an undue hardship discharge of his student loan debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). I write separately to emphasize that whether the debtor enrolled in the Income Contingent Repayment Plan (ICRP) remains merely “a factor” to consider when applying the totality-of-the-circumstances test. In the present case, even assuming that Jesperson’s decision to forgo enrolling in the ICRP was reasonable, other relevant factors, such as “Jes-person’s young age, good health, number of degrees, marketable skills, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re: Nanci Anne Long Debtor. Nanci Anne Long v. Educational Credit Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. In Re Sandra Jane Frushour, Debtor. Educational Credit Management Corporation v. Sandra Jane FrushourCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. In Re: Rose A. Tirch, Debtor. Rose A. Tirch v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re Thomas Francis Barrett, Jr., Debtor. Thomas Francis Barrett, Jr. v. Educational Credit Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Jon P. Goulet v. Educational Credit Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API