Legal Opinion

Woodburn's Administrator v. Stout

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1867PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Monroe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.

— The only question presented to this court is as to the sufficiency of the complaint. It shows (if we allow implications in its favor which may be of questionable admissibility) that the plaintiff Stout was indebted, in 1864, to the estate of one Daniel Stout, deceased, of which Woodburn was administrator; that he paid sixty dollars to the widow of Daniel upon the written order of Woodburn, as such administrator; that subsequently he paid to Woodburn the whole of his indebtedness, not deducting the amount paid upon the order, which he was not then able to produce, having lost it; it being…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Lexington v. RennickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Stedman v. BooneIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Sage v. PrimeIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API