Olczak v. Marchelewicz

Appellee has failed to file a brief in this cause, but we will consider the questions presented in appellant’s brief, as the court in its discretion may do. Hueseman v. Neaman (1933), 97 Ind. App. 586, 187 N. E. 696, and cases there cited.

This case was determined upon the third paragraph of appellant’s complaint, to which appellee filed an answer in two paragraphs. The complaint seeks to recover attorney’s fees alleged to be due appellant from appellee upon a contract between them, whereby appellant was employed by appellee as his attorney to bring and prosecute an action on behalf of…