Commonwealth v. Allen

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

In this, appellant’s second state post-conviction action, 1 he alleges that his privilege against self-in crimination was violated, that his two conrt-appointed attorneys were not competent, that a constitutional right not recognized at the time of trial but applicable retroactively was violated and that his plea of guilty was unlawfully induced. Counsel was appointed and a hearing conducted. Giving appellant’s petition the most charitable reading, there are no facts alleged which m legal contemplation are sufficient to support the first three of his four…