Terry L. Arcoren v. Wenton Peters and John Schooler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentHeaney, Circuit Judge
In my view, Judge Edward Dumbauld’s opinion for the panel correctly stated the law and should be accepted by the Court en banc. Arcoren v. Peters, 811 F.2d 392 (8th Cir.1987). Accordingly, I dissent from the en banc opinion and do so for the reasons so ably set forth by Judge Dumbauld in his opinion of February 2, 1987.
I write only to emphasize several points in the panel opinion which are largely ignored by the majority:(1) The plain language of the fifth amendment to the United States Constitution states, “No person shall * * * be deprived of * * * property, without due process of law.”…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.