Moses v. Banker
The Superior Court of New York City
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The complaint alleges that defendants are co-partners ; that plaintiff sold and delivered to them as such co-partners, ‘certain goods of the value of $1,127.57, and *213that defendants have not paid said. sum; and then demands judgment for the said sum.
The answer denies the sale and delivery; also denies that plaintiff at the time of the alleged sale and delivery was the owner; and alleges at that time the goods were the property of one Wm. K. Van Bukkelin, for whose benefit the answer alleges the suit is posecuted.
The issue was joined in August, 1866.
The cause was reached for trial on the 18th…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cockey v. HurdThe Superior Court of New York City · 1873