Legal Opinion

Cleveland Trencher Co. v. Buckeye Traction Ditcher Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 5, 1940No. 4291 CivilPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KLOEB, District Judge.

Plaintiff company, as the assignee of ■United States letters patents numbers 1,-527,438, number 1,553,833 and number 1,-927,323, all having reference to claimed improvements in the operation of a trench digging machine, complains of the defendant company that it has infringed the rights of plaintiff under the above listed patents and asks injunction, accounting and costs.

The defendant company in its answer denies the legality of plaintiff’s patents; asserts, among other things, that the claimed improvements involve only the exercise of ordinary skill and that they are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Huebner-Toledo Breweries Co. v. Mathews Gravity Carrier Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. Adams v. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  4. Premier MacHine Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
  5. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Transformer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Trencher Co. v. Buckeye Traction Ditcher Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API