Legal Opinion

Richard v. Croom, Unpublished Decision (6-21-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 2002No. Appeal No. C-010524, Trial No. 00CV-02610Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION.

Defendant-appellant Natasha Croom appeals from the trial court's judgment awarding damages to the plaintiffs-appellees, Paul C. Roberson, Evan Richard and Tyrone Roberson, Jr., for injuries sustained when the automobile Croom was operating struck the rear of the automobile in which the appellees were riding. In her assignments of error, Croom contends that the trial court (1) prejudicially deprived her of discovery by not compelling a meaningful independent medical examination ("IME") in compliance with Civ.R. 35, and (2) violated her right to a jury trial. We sustain both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. GlossipOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Walters v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ferguson v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API