Legal Opinion

M. A. Long Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 4, 1934No. L-416PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Government for the construction of a tunnel and intake chamber at Great Falls, Maryland, as a part of a water supply system for the District of Columbia. The work was to be performed under the general direction and supervision of the contracting officer, and in accordance with the terms of detailed specifications which were a part of the contract. The work consisted of three items, (1) the intake chamber at Great Falls, (2) cut and cover conduit, and (3) construction of the tunnel, all to be performed at unit prices. The controversy in suit arises…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Needles ex rel. Needles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  2. Schmoll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API