Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Wrenn

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 23, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudgins, J.

This action is to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when a golf ball driven by the defendant struck the plaintiff, impairing his sight. From a judgment approving a verdict for $5,000.00 the defendant obtained this writ of error.

The defense made in the trial court, and here repeated, was: (1) That the evidence fails to establish any breach of duty owing by the defendant to the plaintiff; (2) that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence; (3) that the injury was the result of an assumed risk.

These contentions necessitate the examination of the evidence, which in view of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. NernbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Toohey v. WebsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  3. Everett v. . GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Stober v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Schlenger v. WeinbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McClanahan v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  2. Boozer v. Arizona Country ClubArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Thurston Metals & Supply Co., Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  4. Zurla v. HydelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Hollinbeck v. DowneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API