Legal Opinion

Muller v. Muller

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBirdie Amsterdam, J.

Petitioner is the mother and natural guardian of the three minor children involved herein. As such, she has instituted this proceeding, under the asserted authority of article 8-A of the Personal Property Law (New York Uniform Gifts to Minors Act), wherein she seeks to compel the respondent, her former husband and father of the minors, as custodian of certain savings accounts, to account, be removed, have herself appointed as successor custodian and other relief. The respondent has cross-moved to dismiss the petition for legal insufficiency.

The petition alleges that respondent in or about the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Samuel H. Salisbury, as Under the Will of Ora S. Hitchcock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Chrysler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  3. Abraham & Straus, Division of Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. FeynmanSuffolk County District Court · 1972
  4. Chrysler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  5. Samuel H. Salisbury, as Under the Will of Ora S. Hitchcock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API