Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D. T.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 2001No. A01A0947PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Appellants, the natural mother of D. T. and D. T. and the putative father of the younger child, appeal from the termination of their parental rights. They contend that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of prior deprivation orders and case plans and by not requiring the Carroll County Department of Family & Children Services (the “Department”) to place the children with a family member. The appellants also challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm the termination order of the juvenile court.

On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. In the Interest of M. L. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. In the Interest of C. L. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. In the Interest of A. M. V.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. In the Interest of D. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R. A. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. In the Interest of D. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. In the Interest of M. A. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. In the Interest of J. D. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. In the Interest of M. D. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API