Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aranson v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 31, 1995No. Nos. 93-519; 93-527; 93-564Published

1DissentThayer, J.

Because I believe the majority’s recognition of a tort of malicious defense is unwise as a matter of policy, I respectfully dissent.

In Rockhouse Mountain Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Town of Conway, 127 N.H. 593, 503 A.2d 1385 (1986), this court acknowledged that recognition of a new cause of action is a question of policy that turns on whether the interest asserted by the plaintiffs should be legally recognized, and, if so, whether the relief sought is the appropriate way to recognize the interest. Id. at 597-98, 503 A.2d at 1387-88. The defendants in this case do not dispute that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. McGranahan v. DaharSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API