Legal Opinion

Walsh v. St. Clair Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Joseph Walsh, assistant prosecuting attorney for St. ■Clair county, applied for a writ of mandamus to compel :Samuel W. Vance, circuit judge of said county, to vacate an order sustaining certain objections to the petition of the auditor general for the sale of lands delinquent for taxes.

1Per curiam

In this matter it appears upon the face of the application that the court, “ for the purpose of having the determination by the Supreme Court,” held the objections made to the proceedings good. The court ■should have passed upon each of the points raised upon its *27merits. The questions suggested are mure properly reviewable on appeal, and the court below should have regarded the matter in that light. In any event, we do not feel called upon to review questions arising during the course of a proceeding, at least until the final judgment of the court below has been given after full consideration.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goodin v. Van HaaftenMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API