Legal Opinion

Ehrler v. Ehrler

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

In this undefended matrimonial action, plaintiff asked for judgment requiring defendant to continue in force certain policies of insurance on his life. Doubting its authority to make such a decree, the court reserved decision on the question. It now concludes that, though the matter is, as to support for the children, not wholly free from doubt, it is without authority, absent an agreement between the parties, to make a judgment requiring defendant, whether as alimony or as support for the children, to maintain life insurance in force.

*235Authority to make an award of alimony or of child support…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Romaine v. . ChaunceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Erkenbrach v. . ErkenbrachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Wilson v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Kirkbride v. Van NoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Burr v. BurrNew York Court of Chancery · 1842

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chaney v. ChaneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Justis v. RistSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. Enos v. EnosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Winter v. WinterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. Chiaramonte v. ChiaramonteNew York Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API