Legal Opinion

Fitzhugh v. . Sackett

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Defendant was the owner of certain real estate, upon which was a mortgage held by plaintiffs’ testator. One Elisha B. Sackett, a brother of defendant, induced the mortgagee to receive certain drafts, purporting to be accepted by defendant, and to assign the mortgage to him. The acceptance was in fact by another William H. Sackett, who was entirely irresponsible. Elisha B. Sackett was in no manner bound to pay the mortgage.

Read the full summary

Defendant was the owner of certain real estate, upon which was a mortgage held by plaintiffs’ testator. One Elisha B. Sackett, a brother of defendant, induced the mortgagee to receive certain drafts, purporting to be accepted by defendant, and to assign the mortgage to him. The acceptance was in fact by another William H. Sackett, who was entirely irresponsible. Elisha B. Sackett was in no manner bound to pay the mortgage. The transaction was unauthorized by defendant, who was entirely ignorant of it at the time, hut who was informed of it a few months thereafter. The mortgage was…

1Per curiam

Opinion for affirmance

All concur, except Church, Ch. J., dissenting.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ahern v. . GoodspeedNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Van Campen v. BrunsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Abraham v. American Exchange National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API