Legal Opinion

Van Norman v. Van Norman

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1948No. 36738PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

The parties hereto are man and wife but have lived separate and apart for a number of years, appellee, the husband, contributing, under order of the chancery court, a monthly amount in aid of support of the wife, the appellant. Five insurance policies, of the face value of' $6,800 in case of death, now exist, and for a number of years have existed, on the life of the husband, payable to the wife as beneficiary. She now has, and for several years has had, these policies in her possession, paying the premiums thereon. The assured has the right to change the beneficiary. The husband instituted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovell v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Holt v. Van EpsSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1875
  3. Biddle v. PaineMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Brumfield v. HooverMississippi Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Norman v. Van NormanMississippi Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API