Legal Opinion

Amie v. Laure

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1962Published

1Opinion of the CourtFbahk Del Vecchio, J.

These are motions by the defendant Lanre, individually and doing business as James Laure Building-Supplies, to dismiss the complaints in the above-entitled actions pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, upon the ground that they do not allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. One action is by the wife, Thelma Amie, for personal injuries; the second is by her husband, Angelo Amie, for expenses of medical services rendered to his wife and for loss of her services.

At the outset it was conceded by plaintiffs’ counsel on argument of the motions that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gimenez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Becker v. RieckNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API