Legal Opinion

State v. Hegland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1984No. Cr. 1021PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Allan M. Hegland appealed from a Benson County Court order denying his motion for a new trial based on the ground of newly discovered evidence under Rule 33(b), N.D.R.Crim.P. We affirm.

Hegland was convicted by a jury of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and of delivery of alcoholic beverages to a person under 21 years of age.

At trial the State’s first witness, Sheriff Ned Mitzel, testified that he entered Heg-land’s residence pursuant to a warrant. He testified that he found four adults and several minors present and that he discovered beer in the refrigerator,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  2. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Ralph Melvin Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  4. Harold Lee Batsell v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. State v. CrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. SkaroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API