State v. Hegland
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Allan M. Hegland appealed from a Benson County Court order denying his motion for a new trial based on the ground of newly discovered evidence under Rule 33(b), N.D.R.Crim.P. We affirm.
Hegland was convicted by a jury of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and of delivery of alcoholic beverages to a person under 21 years of age.
At trial the State’s first witness, Sheriff Ned Mitzel, testified that he entered Heg-land’s residence pursuant to a warrant. He testified that he found four adults and several minors present and that he discovered beer in the refrigerator,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Ralph Melvin Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Harold Lee Batsell v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- State v. CrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Greywind v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SkaroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.