State v. Haney

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant urges that his motion for nonsuit should have been granted because he contends there was no evidence of the value of the stolen motorcycle. The following is how the evidence of value was developed:

“Q. Do you have an opinion satisfactory to yourself as to the fair market value of the Harley Davidson Sports-ter motorcycle you owned on the 23rd of August on that day?

A. Do I have one?

Q. Yes.

A. I would not sell it for no less than $2000.”

Appellant correctly argues that the word “value” as used in the statute does not mean the price at which the owner would sell, but means .…