Legal Opinion
Louden MacHinery Co. v. Day
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 18, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
The action is contract and was heard below by the court upon an agreed statement of facts, and also the testimony of the defendant taken at a previous hearing between the parties which was made a part of the agreed statement by reference. The files and docket entries of the previous trial are by reference made a part of the agreed statement. No supplemental facts were signed and filed by the trial court. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted to the judgment on the ground that it was contrary to and not supported by the agreed facts.
The facts agreed to by the parties…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kennedy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Dent v. Bellows Falls & Saxtons River Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1922
- Leslie v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- Hooker, Corser & Mitchell Co. v. HookerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- People's National Bank v. BrunelleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- B & R SUPPLY COMPANY v. BringhurstUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Armijo v. National Surety Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Bardwell v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Manley Brothers, Inc. v. BushSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- Woodbury Lumber Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.