Legal Opinion

Eggleston v. Pantages

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1918No. 14454PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Jurey, J., entered May 25, 1917, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

— The purpose of this action was to recover the sum of $2,189, alleged to be due upon a written contract. To the first amended complaint, which will be referred to as the complaint, the defendants interposed a demurrer, which was sustained by the trial court. The plaintiff refused to plead further and elected to stand upon the complaint. Judgment was entered dismissing the action. The plaintiff appeals.

The facts stated in the complaint, necessary to the presentation of the question involved, may be summarized as follows:

During the month of May, 1907, the respondents, Alex. Pantages and wife,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delbridge v. BeachWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dieckmann v. RobynMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Douglas State Bank v. LewinsohnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  4. Paton v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Wright v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. George Altman, Inc. v. Vogue Internationale, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Duteau v. DresbachWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State v. DibleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API