Legal Opinion

Rezendes-Walsh v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided November 6, 1996No. 953707EPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGarsh, J.

The City of Boston ("City”) has moved, under Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), for dismissal of Counts I, II, III and V of plaintiffs amended complaint. Those counts purport to state claims by the plaintiff, Linda Rezendes-Walsh, against the City of Boston for constructive taking, unreasonable and capricious application of zoning regulations, civil conspiracy, and declaratory judgment. Each is related to the propriety of the classification of the district in which plaintiffs land is situated as “Open-Space Recreational.” For the reasons stated below, the City of Boston’s motion to dismiss these counts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spring v. Geriatric Authority of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Dinsky v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Carew v. RutherfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Kyte v. Philip Morris Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haney v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API