Legal Opinion

Jones v. Kosing

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau ‘Claire eounty: W. F. Bailey, Circuit Judge. Garnishment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMaeshall, J.

The defendant, Adolph Keller, being indebted to the garnishee, Charles Kosing, in the sum of $1,592, gave as security a bill of sale of some merchandise, situated in his warehouse, for $1,101, and a chattel mortgage to secure the balance of $491 on the stock of goods in his .-.store, subject, however, to a mortgage thereon of $1,680, to "William Keller, another creditor. The latter thereafter sold •the store stock on his mortgage, for $2,175. Thereafter defendant, Adolph Keller, and the garnishee defendant, Kos-ing, made a settlement, in which it was agreed that Kosing should take $1,400 for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spitz v. TrippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Excelsior Mill Co. v. HanoverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API