Cauthen v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for manufacture of liquor; from Pike superior court -Judge Searcy. April 8, 1919.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. “The newly discovered evidence was merely impeaching in its character, and does not constitute sufficient cause for a new trial.” McCrory v. State, 11 Ga. App. 788 (7) (76 S. E. 163); Moreland v. State, 134 Ga. 268 (2) (67 S. E. 804).
2. The ground that the court failed to charge “the law of confessions” is without merit, “since it is well settled that even if the evidence authorizes a charge on the law of confessions, the failure to instruct the jury on that subject, in the absence of an appropriate ivritten request so to do, is not cause for a new trial.” McArthur v. State, 19 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McCrory v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Horton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- McArthur v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Moreland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922