Legal Opinion

Riker Operating Co. v. Martinique Restaurant, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1943Published

1Per curiam

As defendant’s canopy, erected adjacent to plaintiff’s property and extending over the sidewalk from the building line to the curb, interferes with plaintiff’s easement of light and obstructs the view of plaintiff’s restaurant from prospective customers, we think that upon the evidence plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief directing its removal except between the hours of nine p. m. and four a. m. (Brown-Brand Realty Co., Inc., v. Saks & Co., 126 Misc. 336 [opinion by O’Malley, J.], affd. 218 App. Div. 827.)

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and a judgment entered decreeing the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown-Brand Realty Co. v. Saks & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API