Saxton v. Beach
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Buchanan Court of Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge
This was an action commenced by the respondent on certified tax bills for macadamizing, guttering and curbing done adjoining appellants’ property. The counsel for the appellants submit the case on one single point, namely: that there was no authority for doing the work.
The only authorization that is shown on the part of the city of St. Joseph for doing the work is a resolution which was introduced in the city council, and .adopted by that body, instructing the city *489engineer to advertise for tbe macadamizing, guttering and curbing of tbe streets on which the appellants' property fronts. Under…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Eichenlaub v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- People ex rel. Conlon v. MountIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Hallauer v. GosnellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Saxton v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Sheehan v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.