Legal Opinion

U. S. Slicing Mach. Co. v. Wolf, Sayer & Heller, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 13, 1917No. 507PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the U. S. Slicing Machine Company against Wolf, Sayer & Heller, Incorporated. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, District Judge.

This case is entirely separate from the ones just considered relating to the rind-remover, although pertaining to the same machine. Three patents are involved: Van Berkel, 806,-603; Van Berkel, 895,213; and Stukart, 1,039,210.

[1] Title to' the Van Berkel Patents. In respect to the two Van Berkel patents, a question of title is raised by defendant, and in view of its fundamental importance should be first considered. The chain of title is: (1) Van Berkel to an English corporation, called Van Berlcel’s Slicing Machine Manufacturing Company, Limited; and (2) Berkel &…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mandel v. Swan Land & Cattle Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Greer v. FergersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  4. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  5. People ex rel. Miller v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Russo v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. McIntosh Livestock Co. v. BuffingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Guettler v. AlfsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API