Legal Opinion

State v. Driskill, 10-08-10 (5-4-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2009No. Nos. 10-08-10, 10-08-11PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Ricky Driskill, appeals the judgment of the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and motion to declare his sentence void and for resentencing in consolidated cases numbered 10-08-10 and 10-08-11. On appeal, Driskill contends that, pursuant to State v. Sarkozy, 117 Ohio St.3d 86,2008-Ohio-509, he should be permitted to withdraw his pleas and his sentence should be declared void because he was not advised at his change of plea hearing that he was subject to a mandatory five-year term of postrelease control. Finding…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. StaffreyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. CoatsOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. FordOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API