In Re Riverside-Linden Investment Co.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
JOHN J. HARGROVE, Bankruptcy Judge.
At issue are the propriety and reasonableness of attorneys’ fees and costs charged by attorneys for the trustee in a “Supplemental Application for Final Award of Compensation ...” relating to the administration of the Chapter 7 debtor’s estate.
Also at issue is whether the trustee’s attorneys are entitled to interest on fees and costs “carried” by the attorneys pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 726(a)(5). Kathryn Crake (“Crake”), fifty percent general partner of the debtor, objects to the fees and the applicant’s request for interest.
This court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Riverside-Linden Investment Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1988
- In Re Mesa Refining, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Riverside-Linden Investment Co., Debtor. Ralph O. Boldt, Trustee Estes & Hoyt v. Kathryn Crake Earl HaferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- In Re D.W.G.K. RestaurantsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1989
- In Re MotleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
- Huisinga v. Craig & Nichols, P.C. (In Re Byrd)District Court, D. South Dakota · 1993
- Springfield Institution for Savings v. King (In Re King)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.