Legal Opinion
State v. Luhrs
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1990No. 90CA004822PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REECE, RJ.
This appeal questions the procedure a trial court must employ in accepting a no contest plea to a charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, R.C. 4511.19(A), and the minimum requirements imposed upon a defendant to sufficiently challenge the admissibility of breath test results for blood-alcohol content. Defendant-appellant, William L. Luhrs (Luhrs), maintains that his constitutional and statutory rights to due process were violated by the trial court's acceptance of a no contest plea, made by his attorney in his absence He further insists that his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Garfield Heights v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- City of Cleveland v. WhipkeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. GasserOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. JosephOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. DeniroOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. Bublitz, 23547 (9-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Akron v. Tomko, Unpublished Decision (11-3-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. CislerOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.