Legal Opinion

Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. Richolson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1919No. 96-2921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Eighth. Supreme Judicial District. Action by the Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Company against J. J. Richolson and another, in which the named defendant cross-complained and the Foos Gas Engine Company intervened. Judgment for named defendant on his cross-complaint, affirmed by Court of Civil Appeals (181 S. W. 529), and plaintiff and intervener bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, J.

The controversy in this case arose out of an alleged breach of contract of sale of certain machinery for the irrigation of a rice farm. For convenience, the parties will be designated as in the trial court: Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Company, plaintiff; Foos Gas Engine Company, in-tervener; J. J. Richolson and L. P. Bunge, defendants. Intervener was a foreign corporation, engaged in the manufacture of machinery. Plaintiff was a Texas corporation, engaged in the sale of machinery, and acted as agent for intervener in Texas. The*usual course of business between the two corporations was for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. RicholsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Murphy v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. King v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Ross & Sensibaugh v. McLellandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Cox v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API