Legal Opinion

Forehand v. Forehand

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1996No. 2950136PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THIGPEN, Judge.

This case involves post-judgment motion practice.

The trial court entered a divorce judgment in November 1994, and on November 29, 1994, the husband filed a post-judgment motion. Initially, a hearing on the motion was set for December 2, 1994, and on December 14, 1994, the trial court granted the wife a seven-day extension to file a responsive memo. Apparently, no farther action was taken until February 28,1995, when the trial court set a hearing date for April 4, 1995. On March 17,1995, the wife filed a motion to strike the hearing, asserting that the parties had not agreed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Sherer Timber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Wall v. WallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Griffin v. GriffinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Honea v. Raymond James Fin. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API