Harley v. Young

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt concurred.

The judgment in this case was rendered on the 16th of June, and the statement served on the 8th of July, more than twenty days after, so that the time allowed by law had elapsed. The case must therefore rest upon the. judgment roll.

There is another objection to the statement, to which we advert for the purpose of correcting an improper and mischievous practice; that is, that it is not signed by the Judge.

It has heretofore been supposed that the signature of the Judge was unnecessary, except where the…