Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1967No. 4-66-Civ-65PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

The question for decision now arises on the motion of the five third-party defendants to dismiss the action against them because of claimed lack of jurisdiction over them — a jurisdiction which is asserted by the service of process upon each of them outside of Minnesota under the claimed authority of the new Minnesota long-arm statute, Minnesota Laws 1967, Chapter 427, M.S.A. 543.19, effective May 15, 1967.

In the main action several former employees of Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc., a Minneapolis-based contracting firm, have sued the Northwestern National…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DeCook v. Environmental SEC. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  2. Ellwein v. Sun-Rise, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Donnely v. Copeland Intra Lenses, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  4. Leisure Dynamics, Inc. v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. United States v. J & D Enterprises of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API