Dixon v. Northwestern National Bank of Minneapolis
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
The question for decision now arises on the motion of the five third-party defendants to dismiss the action against them because of claimed lack of jurisdiction over them — a jurisdiction which is asserted by the service of process upon each of them outside of Minnesota under the claimed authority of the new Minnesota long-arm statute, Minnesota Laws 1967, Chapter 427, M.S.A. 543.19, effective May 15, 1967.
In the main action several former employees of Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc., a Minneapolis-based contracting firm, have sued the Northwestern National…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- DeCook v. Environmental SEC. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Ellwein v. Sun-Rise, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Donnely v. Copeland Intra Lenses, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Leisure Dynamics, Inc. v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- United States v. J & D Enterprises of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.