Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Lake Drummond Canal Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs and defendant from Ferguson, J., at March- Term, 1914, of Camden.

1Opinion of the CourtClaRK, C. J.

This is an action to compel the defendant to maintain a drawbridge across “Turner’s Cut.” This was refused, and the plaintiffs appealed. The court held that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover damages for the discontinuance of the bridge, and might amend their complaint to so allege, and might submit an issue as to the amount, and the defendant appealed.

Before “Turner’s Cut” was dug, boats went through what was known as the Moccasin Tract,-which is a part of Pasquotank Eiver. The canal company, the Dismal Swamp Canal Company, which was the predecessor of the defendant in title, thereupon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. United States v. Lake Drummond Canal & Water Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API