Legal Opinion
Chauvin International Ltd. v. Goldwitz
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 7, 1996No. 3:92 CV 0431(GLG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
In this trademark infringement action, Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment asking this Court to find that Defendants David M. Goldwitz and Aliena Lindsay have infringed and counterfeited Plaintiffs “BUM” 1 family of trademarks. Plaintiff further asks this Court to permanently enjoin Defendants from using, in connection with the sale of clothing or related accessories, any mark or trade dress that includes the letters “BUM.” For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Document # 137) is GRANTED.
Background
In 1992,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Doe Lang, Petitioner/defendant-Appellant v. Retirement Living Publishing Co., Inc., Respondent/plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Project Strategies Corp. v. National Communications Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Citigroup Inc. v. City Holding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001