Legal Opinion

Hood v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1908No. 1315PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — -Judge Pendleton. July 8, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the criminal court of Atlanta, upon an accusation charging him with the offense of vagrancy. A petition for certiorari was presented by him to the judge of the superior court, who refused to sanction the same; and he excepts to this refusal.

1. As related in the petition for certiorari, the conviction was wholly unauthorized by the evidence submitted; and, under the .previous rulings of this court, when a petition for certiorari is presented to the judge of the superior court, the statements therein contained must be assumed to be true. If they be…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Young v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Sirmans, Morris & Co. v. Zucker Importing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Laws v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Johnson v. Mayor of HazlehurstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API