Legal Opinion

Brandon Eugene Hunter v. Sacramento County, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 16, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01282Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON EUGENE HUNTER, No. 2:22-cv-01282-DC-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., (ECF No. 43) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 18 court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute after plaintiff was given multiple opportunities to 19 oppose defendants’ motion for summary judgment but failed to do so. ECF No. 41. He asks the 20 court to reconsider the ruling. ECF No.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Central Produce El Jibarito v. Luna Commercial Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API