Legal Opinion

McGrath v. Roefs

New York County Courts

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to dismiss complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGibbs, J.

Defendant has moved for an order directing that the complaint herein be dismissed on the ground that the court did not acquire jurisdiction of the person of the defendant. It appears from the papers submitted on the motion that Patrick McGrath instituted an action against Desire Roefs, who is an infant over the age of fourteen years, to wit, eighteen years of age; that the summons was served upon the infant defendant only; that thereafter an answer was filed and issue joined.

Defendant contends that the court never acquired jurisdiction over the defendant, for the service of the summons herein…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gruner v. RuffnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacilio v. ScarpatiCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  2. Lella v. HolmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API