Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wardman v. Iseman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1930No. Appeal 158PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The matter arose in the distribution of money arising from the sheriff’s sale of real estate. The MuntzWright Company of Greenville, Pennsylvania, had for some time been supplying the Ellwood City Harness Company with merchandise. On the 29th of May, 1925, F. L. Iseman and Grace E. Iseman, who operated as the Ellwood City Harness Company, gave the Muntz-Wright Company a bond for $2,000, conditioned that they would pay or caused to be paid all existing and future indebtedness of F. L. Iseman and Grace E. Iseman to the Muntz-Wright Company. The bond and mortgage…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moats v. Thompson, Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Taylor v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  3. Moroney's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  4. Ter-Hoven v. KernsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  5. Land Title & Trust Co. v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re MorrisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Housing Mortgage Corp. v. Allied Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Biersdorff v. BrumfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Biersdorff v. BrumfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Provident National Bank v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. (In Re Johnson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API