Legal Opinion
People v. Hicks
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
Was defendant’s false denial of his criminal conduct to the Probation Department — in violation of an explicit written plea condition that he truthfully answer questions asked of him by the Department — an appropriate basis for enhancement of his sentence? In this case it was.
In a written statement given to the police, defendant admitted to sexual contact with two sisters — then six and seven years old — who had been entrusted to his care. Defendant was later indicted on three counts of first degree rape, one count of second degree rape and four counts of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. OutleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. AveryNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- People v. MingoNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- People v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. RubendallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. CoffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.