Legal Opinion

Buchert v. Schumacher

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 9, 1928No. 28690PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

The ' plaintiff, George H. Buchert, sued the defendants, Emile Schumacher and Carl J. Schumacher, in solido,for damages for a malicious and unsuccessful criminal prosecution based on a charge of malicious mischief. The court below rejected plaintiff’s demand, on the ground that no malice had been proved, since the charge was preferred on the advice of the district attorney. From this judgment, plaintiff has appealed.

The salient facts, as disclosed by the record, are as follows, viz.: For a period of five years plaintiff was a tenant of the defendant Emile Schumacher in the premises No. 6048…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vara v. R. M. Quigley Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Jackson v. BradySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Cointement v. CropperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  4. Decoux v. LieuxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Goudchaux'sSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. River & Rail Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Planchard v. Klaw & Erlanger New Orleans Theatres Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. Buisson v. PrestiaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Dauphine v. HerbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API